Performing Arts Festival launching from Tokyo
Born in 1977. Performing arts journalist. Alongside her career as a journalist, covering articles in 15 countries and 29 cities, this year she has completed an MA in Performance and Culture at Goldsmiths University of London. Her book "Tokyo Theatre Today: Conversations with Eight Emerging Theatre Artists" was published in 2011. For F/T Dialogue she will be leading the program "Blog Camp in F/T" for young critics and journalists.
Learn more:
Report on a "marathon camp" debating art and politics this autumn
Steirischer Herbst is a festival held annually in Graz, Austria. For its fortieth anniversary the festival organized a program under the title of "Truth is Concrete", including a "marathon camp" project involving worldwide artists and critics. Against a backdrop of the Euro crisis, the Arab revolutions and the "We are the 99%" Occupy movements, the event asked how can art participate in politics? And how can we insert artistic ideas into politics? Featuring 200 artists, architects and theorists, as well as 100 specially invited participants, the debates took place twenty-four hours a day in the shared camp-style occupation in Graz. Kyoko Iwaki and Seunghyo Lee, who both took part in the marathon camp, will give a report on the program and consider a relationship between the arts and politics today that can respond to the needs of contemporary society.
12 young bloggers critique F/T in real time in their unique voices
12 young critics and writers from a variety of nationalities and occupations will be blogging daily during the F/T period from their individual perspectives. From reviews to essays, reportage and artist interviews, the project aims to stir up a new media movement in the performing arts with analytical skills and spontaneity as weapons.
Akira Takayama ("Kein Licht II")
The Port B director will talk with the Blog Camp participants regarding his work and contribution to F/T12, "Kein Licht II".
To participate, please send an email with the subject line "Open Campus Inquiry" to ft.dialogue@gmail.com.
In recent years approaches to re-evaluating in a broadly "documentary" style have been advancing, not only in the performing arts, but in diverse artistic forms.
The methodology is not only one style and the motivations behind it are also many, though for plenty of conscious artists, there is undoubtedly an urgent duty to confront "reality" in an extremely revealing and lifelike way. These panel discussions will explore the meanings of what is variously called reality, actuality and the real, gathering artists together to discuss their own creativity and presentation. The debate will cross borders to examine what is "documentary" and what is the relationship between documentary and fiction.
We will consider how best to "connect" the criticism of a present day stage work with "theatre history". For now, at each session various materials will be thrown out there and, based on these, I hope to deepen the debate with the guest speakers and the participants. I was born in Tokyo but as of last year have been living in Kyoto now for 10 years. For "theatre" [drama] and "theatre" [a venue], surely the theme of where someone is currently living will be reflected somewhere.
― Naoto Moriyama
All of theatre = theatre space is a "demo" (in the post-Sixties wider sense of the word). How about trying to re-consider "theatre space history" from this kind of hypothesis? A new definition of the theatre space would be communicated by a new definition of "demo", and vice versa, a redefinition of "demo" would become "theatre space".
Both share the point that they are single places where people gather (or gathered). Paying attention to this point, the group will consider "theatre space history" as a sort of key for recapturing the present, and also why people become so absorbed in drama, which then vanishes at that very place.
What is the language of Asian dance criticism? And can that be shared?
What is dance criticism in Asia?
Asian dance has increasingly begun to attract the attention of European and American critics but there are still not many opportunities for it to be debated by Asian critics. Asian critics also hardly know what each other is discussing in their various fields and from what standpoint. What should we do about this problem that in the region of Asia, with its many historically shared points, there is still no real interchange in dance and critical discourse?
Western critical theory can be an mutual intellectual foundation for Asia. But what about things other than this? Based on the differing geographical spaces and differing histories, each will have its own local knowledge and local awareness of issues. Putting these together, will sharable controversies then appear?
While holding discussions with Asian critics participating in F/T Dialogue mainly on the F/T Emerging Artists Program's productions, these talk sessions will mutually attempt to find what kind of "Asian" framework functions in critical language. This will surely make the framework of "Japan" relevant and lead to the opening up of new perspectives.
― Daisuke Muto
Eureka magazine editor considers F/T, theatre and the contemporary.
Theatre is not complete just by watching it by yourself. But it's not metaphysical. Simply, if you don't talk about a piece of theatre after seeing it, either heaping praise on it or tearing it to pieces, then surely you don't feel like you've really seen it.
Even if it's not with your friends or acquaintances with shared interests, as long as there is a space for talking then you don't need any special effort. In this way I will be hosting an informal discussion with an artist and research about recent fringe theatre trends.
― Mitsuru Yamamoto